As well as this blog, I have been trying to write fiction. I read an interesting thing about writer's block this week which goes something along the lines of; writer's block is your brain's way of telling you the idea you're having is rubbish, and to get you to keep on going until you write something decent.
My brain must be a perfectionist.
Of course, I say this just at the time I'm about to have a couple of (very!) short stories published in a charity anthology. It is, at least, as start. From a small acorn will grow a mighty oak... at least I hope it will.
I have all sorts of fragments of writing here and there, with half started novels, partly described scenes, barely conceived ideas, and words that seem to just tumble off the page.
There are a couple of things whirling around in my mind at the moment, but I'm just not happy with them, and if I'm not happy with them at this stage, how can I be happy writing them, let alone expecting people to actually shell out money and read them?
I guess I'll get there in the end... watch this space.
Sunday, 20 November 2016
Monday, 14 November 2016
11 - Description.
I
do wonder if I should give up online dating. I'm not entirely sure
it's working. And I think the problem is probably me, and that I'm
not exactly what you would call a catch. Oh, and I suck at dating.
(See post 3.)
Online
dating has been described as a numbers game in that you end up
looking through loads of profiles, messaging a number of these
profiles, having actual proper communication with some of these, and
going on dates with some of these... a subset of a subset of a subset
of the whole. And for me that final number is quite a small number.
My
online profile varies between the different apps/sites, I'm on six,
but they all at least tell some details about my personal
circumstance, albeit in varying levels of detail (essentially;
widower, two kids). I did wonder what it was about me that meant I
got few hits.
Then
I got the answer.
About
a week or so ago I got a new dating app, Hinge. #7... In that app, I
used the same set of pictures as the other apps/sites... well, I
think I added in a couple of different ones. But I omitted the
crucial detail mentioned in the brackets in the last paragraph. The
result...
...well,
I got more responses, and more interest, in that one week so far on
that app than from the other six apps put together, over the last
month.
I
realise that this may not be the most scientific approach in that
it's hardly a double-blind experiment (I don't even know how I would
set that up!), but as a rough and ready way of assessing what about
my profiles is off-putting it is pretty telling.
Clearly,
with those I've messaged on Hinge, depending on if conversation is
heading towards meeting I'll tell them about things before we meet. I
wonder what will happen...
10 - Photographs.
Whilst,
yes, this blog is not meant to have a specific theme, given that it's
all about digression, this is yet another dating post...
One
of the things that can be very tricky is to choose the correct
photographs to go on your profile; especially your main profile
picture. Your main picture, especially on the swiping apps, is the
one that has the most riding on it and may cause a potential date to
either look in more detail at your other pictures, and the profile,
or to swipe left and end all possibilities.
I'm
not going to claim my pictures are perfect, but there's one thing
that grates to me in pictures on dating sites; and that's pictures
with other people in.
Now,
I know that it's good to have pictures of you with your friends, etc.
But I don't need to see pictures of them. I've lost count of the
number of times I've looked at a profile picture of two people,
thought “oh, I hope she's the one on the left”, looked at further
photos and realised that no... that's just her friend.
And
that's not even counting the profiles where there's two, or three, or
four people on every single photo, and you have to try to work out
which one it is. I have seen some profiles where there's a couple of
people in every picture. How am I meant to tell which is which!
Lastly,
pictures of kids. I don't mind if you've got kids, but is it
appropriate to put pictures of them on a dating site where there may
be all sorts of weirdos about?
I
mean, it's not a tricky problem to solve. Just paint out the faces of
anyone that's not you. I see some that do this, and it's such a
relief. There's no ambiguity. Or even just a caption saying “that's
me fourth from right, on the second row, with the fez on my head”.
Just make sure it's clear...
Saturday, 12 November 2016
9 - Decisions.
One
of the things I like in fiction is how small decisions can have big
consequences. Especially when they are decisions that seem
inconsequential, and the subsequent consequences are completely
unpredictable, yet completely logical.
I
mean, take a look at an often quoted decision in Star Wars. Near the
start of the first film (that is, the first one made; not episode 1)
an escape pod is jettisoned from the captured Tantive IV. Someone on
the Star Destroyer holding the ship orders his lackeys not to fire as
there are no signs of life.
That
escape pod, of course, held C3P0 and R2D2; the latter of which held
the plans to the Death Star. In choosing not to shoot down that
escape pod, a chain of events was set in motion that led to the
destruction of the Death Star and the eventual downfall of the
Empire.
Had
that escape pod been destroyed, none of that could have happened, and
the Empire would probably have been in charge for a heck of a lot
longer...
And
things can work like this is real life as well. From a personal
perspective, I made an inconsequential decision back in January 1998.
At least, that's the way it seemed. However, that decision put me on
a path that took me to where I am now. I do sometimes wonder what
would have happened had I not made that decision. The places I'd have
gone. Or not gone. The people I'd never have met. And the people
who'd never have been born.
Back
then. January 1998. I was in a rut. I needed change, but I had no
idea how to go about it. Nothing I was doing was changing anything.
But then, slowly, over the year, events brought about by that small
decision, changed everything...
And
now I feel in a rut again. I need change. I know the things I need to
change, and some ways I think I should use to effect a change. But it
doesn't seem to be working.
What
I need is that small decision... and then everything will be alright.
Wednesday, 9 November 2016
8 - Alright.
On a day like today, I think we could all be reminded of the aphorism said by Mark Kermode many times on his Wittertainment podcast (ably assisted by Simon Mayo);
Everything will be alright in the end. And if it's not alright, it's not the end.
Today everything is far from alright. But it's not the end, oh no, it's far from the end.
It's as bad as the Brexit vote. But, it is the will of the people as voted in a democratic process, and abide by it all of us must...
...but we don't have to like it.
Friday, 4 November 2016
7 - Digression.
Actually,
I suppose I should probably should give over a few moments to
explaining why the blog is called what it is... although I guess
Holden's comment that “...I like it when somebody digresses. It's
more interesting and all.” does kind of sum it all up in a rather
succinct manner.
I
want my blog to be able to be a place for me to yak about anything I
feel I want to yak about. In many ways, I could do all of this on
Faceache, but going back to look at old posts is a pain on there, and
besides; on here you can give labels to posts so that you can see all
posts relating to a specific subject. Assuming I remember to label
properly...
You'll
have seen some examples now of things I've yakked about. A couple of
posts about dating (and expect more about this topic; I have a lot to
say...), and a couple on recent news events.
But
there'll be much more that this kind of thing. One post I'm also
working on at the moment is one about how great SpiceWorld is, and
there'll be posts about all sorts of TV shows old, and new. Ditto to
films. And I expect there'll be a few posts about The Catcher in the
Rye as well. I do need to dig out that picture of the lagoon in
Central Park...
So,
yes. All sorts of things. I'll try to update as frequently as
possible, but there may be days between posts. Or then there might be
three posts in a single day. Depends how much I have to say...
Thursday, 3 November 2016
6 - Brexit
So,
this Brexit vote today... there seems to be a lot of gnashing of
teeth that this means Brexit is now off. Er... no. It's not off. What
it means is that the nature of Brexit can now be fully debated in
Parliament to ensure that it is conducted in the best possible way
(or perhaps alternatively; the least worst way).
Hopefully,
it will also mean that the means can be put in place to ensure that
the promises made by the leave campaign prior to the referendum can
be put in place; for example, I trust Theresa May and her Chancellor
will find a way to ensure that the £350 million a week we pay to the
EU goes instead to the NHS.
This
ruling will enable Parliament to scrutinise such things to make sure
they happen, and that guarantees are in place prior to Article 50
being invoked.
So,
Brexit is not off. It's just been made more accountable, and more
likely to be done in a way that makes it better for the country.
Of
course, there is a possibility that Parliament might vote to veto the
referendum result. But I can't see that happening.
Unfortunately.
Wednesday, 2 November 2016
5 - Poppies.
Just
a couple of things about this whole Poppies on football shirts
malarkey...
From
what I can gather this issue has only flared up *once* before, in
2011, when a compromise was made whereby home nations teams were
allowed to wear black armbands with poppies on for the FIFA matches
being played. You would think this would be a much more regular
occurrence, going back many years, but no...
It
had never come up before then, as prior to that date the home nations
teams had *never* worn poppies on their football shirts in any year
before then.
In
fact, the wearing of poppies sewn on to football shirts only became
universal (in the Premier League) since... erm... 2010, and the
earliest date I can find to a team doing this is 2003, and they were
stated to be the first team ever to do so.
So,
it's hardly a long standing tradition. And it's also not like there
can't be other tributes paid to the those who died in wars as wreaths
can be laid, or a two minute silence held, or a brass band can play
The Last Post, or anything else the team might like to do.
It's
just for a FIFA sanctioned match, you can't adorn your shirt with
anything that doesn't fit with their very narrow kit regulations. No
additional images, symbols, or logos, are allowed, and this is
applied to all countries in FIFA matches.
Whether
the poppy is, or isn't, a political symbol is irrelevant (I would say
it isn't; FIFA disagree), as even if FIFA hadn't deemed it political
it wouldn't be allowed anyway, as the rule notes;
"On
all Playing Equipment items used on, or brought into (permanently or
temporarily), the Pitch Area, for all Matches, any form of
advertising for sponsors, products, Manufacturers (exceeding the
extent of Manufacturer’s Identifications permitted under Chapter VI
above), Suppliers or any third parties, of political, religious,
commercial, personal statements, images and/or
other announcements, is strictly prohibited."
other announcements, is strictly prohibited."
If
not political, it would fail on other counts, anyway.
Just
wear the armbands. The precedent has been set.
4 - Messages.
Continuing
on from the previous post, another thing that gets my goat about
online dating is messaging. At times.
If
it's a site like OkCupid or Plenty of Fish where you can send a
message to pretty much anyone, to not get a reply isn't unexpected,
and to get one message back for every ten first messages sent
wouldn't be too bad a ratio. I suspect my actual ratio is somewhat
lower.
But
for places like Tinder or Bumble, where you can only exchange
messages once you've both “liked” each other, to not reply to a
message seems odd. I mean, if you had no intention of messaging or
anything why “like” in the first place. I guess I could
appreciate it if it were only a few times this happens, but it seems
to be the norm.
Maybe
I'm unusual. Maybe I'm a rare person that only swipes right if I
really would send a message to the person. But to me that seems to be
a logical thing to do. Why swipe right if you don't have any
intention of following it up?
Ah,
well...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)